For information on 2025 CLIA changes for clinical laboratories, download a CMS FAQ that highlights relevant updates.
The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) of 1988 are federal regulatory standards that apply to any facility which performs laboratory testing on specimens obtained from humans for the purpose of providing information for health assessment and for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of disease. These regulations are in place to help assure quality is achieved so patients and physicians can be confident test results are accurate and reliable.
Learn how to obtain a CLIA certificate with this resource from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
CLIA oversight is primarily administered by Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Division of Laboratory Systems (DLS). DLS’s focus and goal is to improve the quality and safety of clinical and public health testing and practice. Visit DLS for resources and training opportunities.
COLA is a laboratory accreditating organization that offers discounts to AAFP members on education and services. AAFP is a member of COLA, and AAFP-appointed physicians serve on the COLA Board of Directors.
Quality assurance is an ongoing, comprehensive program which analyzes every aspect of an entire operation. It involves determining a quality goal, deciding whether or not the goal has been achieved and implementing corrective action if the goal has not been reached.
In the laboratory, quality assurance involves the entire testing process:
The CLIA regulations (Subpart K) addresses laboratory requirements and quality assurance systems. Medical decisions are made based on lab results performed in the office and at reference laboratories. Where the test is performed should not negate the significance of accurate and reliable results. Accurate test results are crucial to patient care.
Good Quality Assurance systems include the following:
For information from CDC’s Lab Standards webpage, visit Laboratory Quality Assurance and standardization Programs.
Assessing testing quality requires planned and systematic monitoring to test processes. Conducting these activities can lead to reduced errors, improved patient outcomes, improved patient and employee safety and reduced costs. Both internal and/or external mechanisms for quality assurance may be used depending on the needs, resources, and practices of the testing site.
First: Establish laboratory procedures for each step of the testing processing, include components of testing such as, but not limited to:
Second: Define administrative responsibilities to laboratory management. Consider things such as:
Third: Specify, in writing, laboratory’s investigation plan and who will be responsible for follow through and implementation of correction action when problems or errors are identified. Document all quality assurance activities. As the saying goes, if it is not written down, it didn’t happen.
Fourth: High-quality patient testing requires verification of staff competency and test methods employed in your medical lab.
Staff competencies should assess their knowledge, skills and abilities needed to perform patient testing successfully. Staff assessments should be documented and performed annually after the first year of employment. During first year of employment, competency assessment is required semiannually.
Competency assessment must include the following 6 components for each test or test platform:
CLIA does not require competency assessment of staff for waived testing, however ensuring accurate results is essential to make the right patient diagnosis. Staff assessments are necessary to ensure staff are following manufacturers’ instructions. Keep in mind, any variation from manufacturer’s instructions of waived tests will negate waived status and test will be subject to all regulations as a moderate complex test.
Laboratories with provider-performed microscopy (PPM) certificates are required to meet competency assessment in all 6 components. All testing personnel in PPM laboratories are required to have annual competency.
For detailed information from CMS regarding staff competency, visit CMS brochure What Do I Need to Do to Assess Personnel Competency.
Method verification of test procedures is required to ensure, by objective evidence, the instrument or test method consistently provides accurate patient results Method verification must be completed prior to reporting your first patient test result. CMS has a published guide for Verification of Performance Specifications to help navigate this regulation.
When should method verification be performed?
Who is responsible for ensuring verification is completed and meets criteria?
What performance specifications are included in verification?
How is test verification most commonly accomplished?
These materials can be used in multiple ways to verify accuracy, precision, and reportable range. The number of specimens needed for each analyte and for each part of the verification process may vary. The Laboratory Director and Technical Consultant/Supervisor are responsible for determining the appropriate number of samples. As a rule of thumb, 20 specimens spanning the reportable range for quantitative analytes. Five positive and five negative specimens for qualitative analytes.
Most laboratory errors occur in the pre and post analytical phases, while less than 10% of all errors happen during the testing or analytical phase. Establishing robust processes to ensure quality patient results are obtained every time is the whole purpose of having a quality assurance plan.
The most vulnerable components in the pre-analytical phase of testing and prone to errors are proper patient identification, good quality specimen collection, timely transport, and appropriate physician order. While timeliness in reporting and incorrect data entry are most prone errors in the post analytical phase.
A well-prepared procedure manual provides a foundation for the lab’s quality assurance program. Its purpose is to ensure consistency while striving for quality. The procedure manual may be used to:
The procedure manual should be written at a level that everyone in the laboratory can understand. It must be useful, clear to the user, and available at the bench/work area.
All testing personnel should be required to read the entire procedure manual. It is advisable to include a page at the front of the manual where personnel can “sign-off” when they have read the manual. An annual review would benefit the lab personnel and could be included as part of the overall quality assurance program.
Include a general policies section addressing lab-specific issues, such as:
All labs must have a written procedure manual for the performance of all tests performed in the lab. The manual must be readily available and followed by laboratory personnel. Textbooks may be used in addition to the procedure manual. The following information is required to be included (CLIA regulations, Subpart K, 493.1211):
Manufacturer’s package inserts or operator manuals may be used to meet the requirement; any information not included by the manufacturer must be included by the laboratory. All procedures must be approved, signed, and dated by the laboratory director. Procedures must be re-approved, signed and dated if the director of the laboratory changes; each change must be approved, signed, and dated by the current laboratory director. The laboratory must maintain a copy of each procedure with the dates of initial use and discontinuance, retaining records for two years after the procedure has been discontinued.
Preparing the procedure manual is typically the most time consuming portion of developing a quality assurance program. It is worth a little extra effort to make sure that it is useful. The design should be determined by the lab’s needs and organization. Some tips include:
In the POL with limited space, it is helpful to use a card index system as a supplement to the procedure manual. This system is an abbreviated form; it should contain the first six elements from Table 1. A copy of each card should be included in the actual procedure manual.
Sources: NCCLS Document GP2-A3, Clinical Laboratory Technical Procedure Manuals, 3rd ed.; The New Poor Man's (Person's) Guide to the Regulations, Laessig and Ehrmeyer
Waived tests are defined to employ methodologies so simple and accurate as to render the likelihood of erroneous results is very low when manufacturer procedure is followed. However, with the advancement of technologies, tests that are FDA approved for waived or home testing, does not mean waived tests are completely error-proof. They pose no reasonable risk of harm to the patient if the test is performed incorrectly, and they are cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for home use. Errors can occur anywhere in the testing process, particularly when the manufacturer’s instructions are not followed and when testing personnel are not familiar with all aspects of the test system.
Some waived tests have potential for serious health impacts if performed incorrectly. For example, results from waived tests can be used to adjust medication dosages, such as prothrombin time testing in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy and glucose monitoring in diabetics. In addition, erroneous results from diagnostic tests, such as those for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody, can have unintended consequences. To decrease the risk of erroneous results, the test needs to be performed correctly, by trained personnel and in an environment where good laboratory practices are followed.
Offices wanting only to perform waived tests must apply for a certificate of waiver (COW).
Provider-performed microscopy (PPM) procedures are a select group of moderately complex microscopy tests commonly performed by licensed health care providers during patient office visits. Tests included in PPM procedures do not meet the criteria for waiver because they are not simple procedures; they require training and specific skills for test performance. A CLIA Certificate for PPM procedures allows physicians, midlevel practitioners (i.e., nurse practitioners, nurse midwives, and physician assistants) and dentists to perform certain moderate complexity microscopic examinations in addition to waived testing during a patient’s visit.
The laboratory or testing site performing PPM procedures is not subject to routine biennial inspections. However, a CLIA certificate is required, and the laboratory or testing site must meet the CLIA quality standards for moderate complexity testing.
Sites performing PPM procedures must file for a Certificate for PPM procedures and obtain a separate certificate for each location.
Other key notes about PPM:
A. Allowed microscopic exams using bright field or phase-contrast microscopy:
B. The specimens for these procedures deteriorate quickly or delay in performing the test could compromise the accuracy of the test result, therefore recommended to be performed during the course of the patient visit.
C. Quality control is required when it is available; control material is available for urine sediments.
D. PPM tests are considered non-regulated, proficiency testing (PT) is not specifically required, but a laboratory is responsible for documenting quality assurance. For more guidance read the PPM Procedures: A Focus on Quality Practices booklet authored by CDC.
E. Several CLIA-approved PT programs offer modules for PPM and participation in a clinical microscopy or PPM PT module will satisfy the bi-annual alternative competency assessment requirement. If laboratories or testing sites enroll in PT, they are subject to all requirements for PT including the prohibition of PT referral.
F. Those laboratories with an inspecting agency other than CMS/state agencies should contact their inspecting agencies to inquire about their specific requirements.
G. The 42 CFR 493- October 2001 indicates that PPM laboratories are subject to Subparts H (Proficiency Testing), J (Patient test Management), K (Quality Control), M (Personnel), and P (Quality Assurance).
The correct answer to all of these questions is false. Being a CLIA waived or provider performed microscopy (PPM) lab does not mean there aren't specific regulatory criteria for the physician office laboratory (POL) to adhere to.
Under the CLIA regulations, POLs with a certificate of waiver (COW) may perform only those tests that have been classified as waived. POLs with a PPM certificate may perform tests, using a microscope, during the course of a patient visit on specimens that are not easily transportable, along with the waived tests.
Waived labs are required by CLIA to:
The number and types of tests waived under CLIA have increased from eight tests to approximately 40 since the inception of the program in 1992. As a result, the number of waived labs has grown exponentially from the total 171,000 laboratories enrolled.
PPM labs are required by CLIA to:
Effective December 28, 2024, CLIA regulations require a non-pathologist physician to:
The CLIA personnel requirements are found in Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subpart addresses qualifications and responsibilities for provider performed microscopy (PPM), moderate complexity, and high complexity laboratories. Laboratories performing only waived testing do not have specific personnel qualifications.
However, waived laboratories need oversight to consistently achieve quality patient testing. The individual designated for oversight should have the technical knowledge and experience to problem-solve testing issues and provide support to testing personnel.
A moderate complexity laboratory is required to have personnel who meet the following qualifications (in most situations, the laboratory director is qualified to full multiple roles):
MD/DO/DPM certified in anatomic or clinical pathology*
PhD/DCLS degree in fields such as biology, chemistry, clinical laboratory science, medical technology (MT), or medical laboratory science (MLS),* the individual must also:
MD/DO/DPM not certified in pathology* must also:
Master’s degree in fields such as biology, chemistry, clinical laboratory science, medical technology (MT), or medical laboratory science (MLS), the individual must also:
Bachelor’s degree in fields such as biology, chemistry, clinical laboratory science, medical technology (MT), or medical laboratory science (MLS), the individual must also:
Degrees in fields other than those aforementioned may require transcripts so applicable coursework can be evaluated and approved.
Laboratory directors are responsible for the laboratory’s total compliance, even if responsibilities are delegated to others.
*—Laboratory directors of high complexity laboratories must have two years of experience directing high-complexity testing (verses one year of experience needed for moderate-complexity testing). See the federal register for more details if needed.
The laboratory must have a technical consultant qualified by education and either training or experience to provide technical consultation for each of the specialties and subspecialties tested in the laboratory. The qualifications include:
AND
OR
OR
OR
The clinical consultant must be qualified to consult with and render opinions to the laboratory’s clients concerning the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patient care. The qualifications include:
OR
The laboratory must have a sufficient number of individuals who meet the qualifications to perform the volume and complexity of tests performed. Qualifications include:
AND
OR
OR
OR
The CLIA inspection regulations are found in Subpart Q of the Code of Federal Regulations, which addresses both basic and specific inspection requirements. All laboratories issued a CLIA certificate and all CLIA-exempt laboratories must comply with the applicable inspection requirements.
CMS's policy for inspections includes an announced initial and biennial recertification inspection and unannounced complaint and follow-up inspections. The process focuses more on outcomes as opposed to processes. CMS's objectives in developing an outcome-oriented survey process were to not only determine the laboratory's regulatory compliance but to assist laboratories in improving patient care by emphasizing those aspects that have a direct impact on the laboratory's overall test performance. CMS promotes the use of an educational survey process.
Laboratories are required to permit CMS or its representatives to conduct an inspection. CLIA-exempt and accredited laboratories must permit validation and complaint inspections. As part of the process, laboratories may be required to:
Note: CMS or its representatives may conduct an inspection when there are complaints alleging non-compliance with the regulations. Failure to permit an inspection of any type results in suspension or cancellation of the laboratory's participation in Medicare and Medicaid for payment and suspension or limitation of or action to revoke the laboratory's CLIA certificate.
While laboratories issued a certificate of waiver or certificate for provider performed microscopy are not subject to biennial inspections, CMS or its representatives may conduct inspections at any time during the laboratory's hours of operation to:
Waived and PPM laboratories must comply with all of the basic inspection requirements.
Laboratories issued a registration certificate must permit an initial inspection to assess the laboratory's compliance with the regulations before issuance of a certificate of compliance. These inspections may occur any time during the laboratory's hours of operation and may include review of PPM testing. CMS or its representatives may conduct subsequent inspections on a biennial basis or with such frequency as necessary to ensure compliance.
Subsequent inspections are based on compliance history. Laboratories demonstrating CLIA compliance (based on type and number of deficiencies cited previously, proficiency testing performance, and number and types of complaints lodged) are given the opportunity to participate in the Alternative Quality Assessment Survey (AQAS), which is a self-survey document. This option is available every other survey cycle (a two-year period).
CMS or its representatives may conduct validation and complaint investigation inspections of any accredited or CLIA-exempt laboratory at any time during its hours of operation.
Should an accredited laboratory fail to be in compliance with one or more condition-level requirements, it is subject to a full review by CMS; should a CLIA-exempt laboratory fail to be in compliance with one or more condition-level requirements, it is subject to appropriate enforcement actions under the approved state licensure program.
Along with stipulating qualifications, the CLIA regulations specify the expected of duties for the laboratory director. The director has the responsibility for the overall administration and operation of the laboratory, including hiring personnel who are competent to perform laboratory testing and record/report test results promptly, accurately, and proficiently.
The director is also responsible for assuring compliance with the regulations. The regulations related to the director are contained in Subpart M, along with those for the technical consultant, clinical consultant, and testing personnel. The laboratory director must be accessible to the laboratory to provide on-site, telephone, or electronic consultation as needed. CLIA requires a laboratory director to be on-site at least once every six months, with at least four months between the visits. Each visit must be documented with supporting evidence of lab director duties being performed.
A person may direct no more than five laboratories. If qualified, the laboratory director may perform the duties of the technical consultant, clinical consultant, and testing personnel, or delegate these responsibilities to personnel meeting the appropriate qualifications. If the laboratory director reassigns performance of his/her responsibilities, he/she remains responsible for ensuring all duties are properly performed. Duties for directing a moderate level laboratory include:
Source: 42 CFR 493 (Subpart M, 493.1407)
LABORATORY RECORD | PERIOD OF RETENTION |
Proficiency Testing Results (copies of what was submitted to the PT provider) | 2 years |
Attestation Statement | 2 years |
Proficiency Testing Evaluations | 2 years |
All other PT related forms | 2 years |
LABORATORY RECORD | PERIOD OF RETENTION |
Test Requisitions | 2 years |
Test Records | 2 years |
Immunohematology | 5 years |
Test Reports | 2 years |
Immunohematology | 5 years |
LABORATORY RECORD | PERIOD OF RETENTION |
Discontinued procedures | 2 years |
Method Performance Specifications | 2 years |
Equipment Maintenance and Function Checks | 2 years |
Calibration and Calibration Verification | 2 years |
Control Procedures (e.g., daily QC records) | 2 years |
Remedial Action - errors in reported results (both the original and corrected report) | 2 years |
Before your laboratory can perform any testing, your practice must obtain the appropriate CMS CLIA certification.
CLIA, which is administered by CMS, FDA, and CDC, regulates the quality and safety of U.S. clinical laboratories to ensure the accuracy, reliability, and timeliness of patient test results regardless of where the test was performed. CLIA has regulatory requirements for quality that all laboratories must meet.
Certificate type is based on the highest level of test complexity performed by a laboratory. Laboratories can apply for one of the following:
a. COC is issued to a lab after an inspection by state agency and found to be in compliance.
b. COA is issued to a lab after an inspection by a CMS approved non-profit accreditation organization, such as COLA, and found to be complying with CLIA regulations.
For questions about applying for a CLIA certificate or filling out the application: