Over the years medical groups have adopted diagnostic algorithms and practice guidelines that include “race corrections” intended to control for biological differences. But there is mounting evidence that race is not a reliable proxy for genetic variation.
When developing or applying algorithms and practice guidelines with a racial component, physicians should ask these three questions:1
1. Is the need for race correction based on robust evidence and statistical analyses (with consideration of internal and external validity, potential confounders, and bias)?
2. Is there a plausible causal mechanism for the racial difference that justifies the race correction?
3. Would implementing this race correction relieve or exacerbate health inequities?
1. Vyas DA, Eisenstein LG, Jones DS. Hidden in plain sight — reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(9):874–882.
Read more Practice Pearls from the literature and from your colleagues in FPM. Got a Pearl you’d like to share? Comment below or send it to FPM.
Sign up to receive FPM's free, weekly e-newsletter, "Quick Tips & Insights," featuring practical, peer-reviewed advice for improving practice, enhancing the patient experience, and developing a rewarding career.
Disclaimer: The opinions and views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent or reflect the opinions and views of the American Academy of Family Physicians. This blog is not intended to provide medical, financial, or legal advice. All comments are moderated and will be removed if they violate our Terms of Use.