The peer review system used for AFP manuscripts helps ensure that the published content is of the highest standards. Manuscripts submitted to AFP go through this process before it's decided whether they will be accepted for publication. Manuscripts are initially reviewed by Jay Siwek, M.D., editor, for suitability and adherence to AFP guidelines. If a manuscript's content is judged to be appropriate for AFP, it is sent to several peer reviewers, including at least two family physicians. In addition, manuscripts are reviewed by at least two specialists in other disciplines, or family physicians who have expertise in the subject. To facilitate candid comments and objectivity, the peer review system is double-blind (i.e., the authors do not know the reviewer's identity, and the reviewers do not know the manuscript author's name).

Reviewers methodically evaluate the manuscript, which often requires hours of research and effort. The reviewers' detailed evaluations are returned to Dr. Siwek who, along with AFP's other medical editors, determines whether the manuscript should be considered for publication. The AFP peer reviewers volunteer their valuable time to help us ensure the quality of AFP content. Because of the substantial amount of time a review may require, AFP reviewers may receive up to two Prescribed credits per review. If you would like to serve as a peer reviewer for AFP, please e-mail a note of interest toafpjournal@georgetown.edu.

We thank the reviewers listed below, each of whom reviewed at least one manuscript during 2006, for their important input, advice, and support.