The website will be down for maintenance from 6:00 a.m. to noon CDT on Sunday, June 30.

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(6):580

Clinical Question

Does oseltamivir reduce the likelihood of hospitalization in adults with influenza?

Bottom Line

There is no evidence that oseltamivir reduces the likelihood of hospitalizations in adults with influenza, even in high-risk or older patients; however, it has relatively common and nonserious harms. (Level of Evidence = 1a)

Synopsis

In 2012, a meta-analysis reported on published and unpublished studies of oseltamivir. It was less effective than what was reported in the published trials in terms of mean reduction of symptom duration (only 21 hours), it did not reduce the likelihood of complications once acute bronchitis was excluded as a complication, and there was no difference in the likelihood of complications (1.3% for oseltamivir vs. 1.2% for placebo). In 2014, these findings were largely confirmed by a similar meta-analysis; however, two industry-sponsored analyses found a reduction in hospitalizations with oseltamivir. This study is an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared oseltamivir with placebo for the outcome of hospitalization. The authors identified 15 randomized trials (including six studies that have been published since 2014) with a total of 6,166 participants confirmed to have influenza and randomized to receive oseltamivir or placebo. The patients' mean age was 45.3 years, and 54% were female. The studies were performed in outpatient or primary care settings. Patients who received oseltamivir were not less likely to be hospitalized (relative risk [RR] = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.29; risk difference = −0.17%; 95% CI, −0.23% to 0.48%), and this finding had good homogeneity (I2 = 0%). Oseltamivir did not reduce hospitalizations in older patients (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.21 to 4.90) or high-risk patients (RR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.28). The authors also analyzed harms and found increases in nausea (number needed to harm = 9) and vomiting (number needed to harm = 6), with no effect on cardiovascular, neurologic, or psychiatric events.

Already a member/subscriber?  Log In

Subscribe

From $165
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 130 CME credits/year
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Subscribe

Issue Access

$59.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Purchase Access:  Learn More

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.