Website maintenance is scheduled for Saturday, January 18, and Sunday, January 19. Short disruptions will occur during these days.

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2025;111(1):84

CLINICAL QUESTION

What are the major cardiovascular benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors in different patient populations?

BOTTOM LINE

A 14% reduction in cardiovascular death and a number needed to treat of 200 for 3 years to prevent one death was reported with SGLT-2 inhibitors. (Level of Evidence = 1a−)

SYNOPSIS

The authors of the meta-analysis included studies that compared SGLT-2 inhibitors with placebo in at least 1,000 patients who were followed up for at least 6 months. They found a total of 11 studies with 78,607 patients; all studies were industry sponsored. The mean age ranged from 62 to 72 years, 34% were female, and 75% were White. Nearly 80% of patients had diabetes, and 37% had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Follow-up ranged from 1.3 years to 4.2 years. The authors combined studies of different SGLT-2 inhibitors, such as empagliflozin (Jardiance), dapagliflozin (Farxiga), ertugliflozin (Steglatro), and canagliflozin (Invokana), and did not identify the specific medication used in the results tables.

In four studies of patients with diabetes and high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), there was a significant overall reduction in the composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (ie, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death) with SGLT-2 inhibitors (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86–0.97). A similar benefit was seen in three studies of patients with chronic kidney disease but not in studies of patients with heart failure (HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86–1.01). It is important to point out that in the four trials with patients at high risk for CVD, two studies included only patients with established CVD, and the other two studies included 40% to 67% of patients with CVD. There was heterogeneity; for example, two of three trials that included patients with kidney disease produced negative results, and only one showed a significant benefit. There was no significant reduction in myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke, although cardiovascular deaths were significantly reduced (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81–0.92).

Already a member/subscriber?  Log In

Subscribe

From $165
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 130 CME credits/year
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Subscribe

Issue Access

$59.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Purchase Access:  Learn More

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

Copyright © 2025 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.