Leave a Message
brand logo

POEMs

Patient-Oriented Evidence That Matters

Inconsistent Benefit vs Harm of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants for Chronic Pain Syndromes

CLINICAL QUESTION

Are skeletal muscle relaxants, such as baclofen, tizanidine, and cyclobenzaprine, safe and effective for the long-term treatment of chronic pain in adults?

BOTTOM LINE

The review found that the long-term use of skeletal muscle relaxants is no better than placebo for low back pain, fibromyalgia, and headaches. Evidence is minimal for beneficial relief from trigeminal neuralgia, painful nocturnal cramps, and neck pain. Because of the common adverse effects of drowsiness and dizziness, clinicians should deprescribe these medications in patients whose pain-related goals are not being met. (Level of Evidence = 2a)

SYNOPSIS

The investigators searched multiple databases, including Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane, and other reviews and bibliographies for studies that evaluated the long-term use of skeletal muscle relaxants for chronic pain syndromes. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on the use of skeletal muscle relaxants for at least 4 weeks in adults with painful syndromes lasting 3 months or longer. The authors included articles published in English, Spanish, and Italian. Two individuals independently screened studies for inclusion criteria and methodologic quality using standard scoring systems. Disagreements were resolved by consensus discussion with a third reviewer.

Already a member/subscriber?  Log In

Subscribe

From $165
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 130 CME credits/year
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Subscribe

Issue Access

$59.95
  • Immediate, unlimited access to this issue's content
  • CME credits
  • AAFP app access
  • Print delivery available
Purchase Access:  Learn More

POEMs (patient-oriented evidence that matters) are provided by Essential Evidence Plus, a point-of-care clinical decision support system published by Wiley-Blackwell. For more information, see http://www.essentialevidenceplus.com. Copyright Wiley-Blackwell. Used with permission.

For definitions of levels of evidence used in POEMs, see https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/Home/Loe?show=Sort.

To subscribe to a free podcast of these and other POEMs that appear in AFP, search in iTunes for “POEM of the Week” or go to http://goo.gl/3niWXb.

This series is coordinated by Natasha J. Pyzocha, DO, contributing editor.

A collection of POEMs published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/poems.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2025 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.