Leave a Message

The website may be down at times on Saturday, May 3, and Sunday, May 4, for maintenance. 

brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2025;111(4):304-305

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

Although most physicians are interested in the use of augmented or artificial intelligence (AI) in health care, only 38% are using AI in their practices.1 Initial results from AI integrated organizations show that AI scribe programs significantly decrease electronic health record workload, and as physician burnout rates remain high, there is greater interest in AI tools.2,3 The cautious approach to AI by physicians is due in part to the absence of necessary oversight and a limited regulatory framework.4 As AI changes health care delivery, primary care must be at the forefront to shape practice transformation.5

AI scribe services aim to reduce administrative burden, although the nuances of implementation vary between companies. Most tools feature customizable note templates, including national repositories used by other clinicians. Most available AI scribe tools offer medical code extraction, ranging from identifying key diagnoses and billable procedures to suggesting additional codes based on commonly co-occurring disorders, all with the hope of reducing the burden on doctors.

An environmental scan of the literature was used to identify evaluations of AI in practice. There are few studies on AI scribes, and none include direct comparative analytics of the various products. Several commentary and opinion pieces highlight the immense promise of AI scribes while remaining wary of the significant risks, including technical limitations and ethical concerns.68 One perspective piece illuminates particular concern about chart integrity degradation, biases, and “model collapse” where future AIs are trained on past data, ultimately leading to performance decline.9 Although these critiques are valid, they underestimate the dynamic nature of technologic evolution and health care’s capacity to refine these tools, ensuring they are tailored to meet the evolving needs of clinicians.

The authors also explored commercially available clinical AI scribes through reviews from peer forums and vendor marketplace sites. The list was compiled based on reputable reviews, popularity, and commercial availability. Platforms with insufficient online presence and those still in the beta testing stage, such as Doximity GPT, were eliminated from consideration. Eight companies were identified for review (Table 1).1019 Services offered by companies included ambient listening, note generation (eg, history of present illness, review of systems, physical examination, assessment and planning), diagnosis coding, and order recommendations. The most cited concerns pertained to accuracy. Although some AI scribe services claim to have 90% to 99% accuracy, users have reported a different experience.10,12,14 AI hallucination, or false information produced by a generative AI model, ranges in severity from misleading to outright fabrication.6 This is a marked concern for clinicians who rely on accurate documentation to facilitate patient care and protect against litigation. Consequently, not all users believed that the scribe saved documentation time because of the need to review and edit the AI-generated notes.2,10

PlatformCost per month* ProsCons
DeepScribeNot publishedProofread by human
Notes require minimal editing
EHR integration
No free trial
Pulls in irrelevant information
Lack of coding help
Nabla$119Live transcription
Asynchronous care documentation
Does not store user data
Struggles to filter out content
Minimal integration
Freed$99User friendly
Adapts future notes to user feedback
No EHR integration
Concerns with accuracy transcription
Abridge$99
$249 integrated
Epic EHR integration
Asynchronous care documentation
No free trial
Difficult to use at small institutions
Suboptimal order entry
Heidi$69Multidisciplinary team collaboration
Multilingual transcription
No mobile application
Concerns with transcription accuracy
Nuance$600Deep integration and high accuracy
Automatically documents encounters
Difficult to use at small institutions
Delayed note generation
Suki$399 integratedUser friendly
Artificial intelligence assistant accessed through voice command
No free trial
Suboptimal ambient mode documentation
Lyrebird Health$89Quick note generation
Customizable templates and adaptive note writing
Integration challenges

AI scribe services are promising for electronic health record interoperability and improved care delivery. However, the need for appropriate AI oversight is clear.20 Regulation and policies should promote patient safety and information security. The risk of biases perpetuated by AI algorithms and the threat of data breaches must be mitigated through ethical and accountable governance.21 The trustworthiness and acceptance of AI remains uncertain.

The information and opinions contained in research from the Graham Center do not necessarily reflect the views or the policy of the AAFP.

This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, deputy editor.

A collection of Graham Center Policy One-Pagers published in AFP is available at https://www.aafp.org/afp/graham. One-Pagers are also available at https://www.graham-center.org.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2025 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.