Many codes bundle with evaluation and management (E/M) services using modifier 25, but payers often indicate that codes that include modifier 25 are potentially abusive. (Read about Cigna's recent modifier-25 policy change in this FPM blog post and AAFP News story.)
To protect yourself from payer scrunity, here are some tips for using modifier 25 properly:
- Never append modifier 25 to a code that is not found in the E/M section of CPT.
- Only report modifier 25 with documentation of the E/M service sufficient to demonstrate that it was significant and not part of another service provided on the same date, as well as independently supporting the level of service reported.
- Report an E/M service with modifier 25 when a significant and distinct E/M service is indicated even when both services are related to the same diagnosis (e.g., E/M of asthma and in-office spirometry).
- Document time-based services to clearly support the total time of the E/M service (e.g., “I spent 30 minutes providing and documenting this E/M service separate from the time spent in interpretation and report of the electrocardiogram”).
- When the purpose of the patient visit is to receive a pre-planned service, only report an E/M service when clinically indicated. Don’t report a brief E/M service that was not clinically indicated or required an insignificant amount of time or work (e.g., verifying the patient felt well and was afebrile prior to an injection).
- Learn how each minor procedure is valued to include some pre-evaluation time, and don’t report a separate E/M code for work included in this time. For example, incision and drainage of an abscess includes eight minutes of pre-evaluation time, per the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Work Time file.
- Perform chart reviews periodically to assess your use of modifier 25.
For more information, see:
— Cindy Hughes, CPC, CFPC